About Me

Name: Marie-Jacqueline
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Voters Need to Know Before They cast Their Vote:


I have been researching and fact checking and ran across what may be one of the best presentation of facts I have come across.

Please consider the content..what does it hurt to look? If half of what is said is true -it is enough to give all Americans pause and a reason to  be concerned. 

Just make sure you have all the facts before you pull the lever in the polling booth.


http://oldbluewebdesigns.com/USSA.htm
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMLeamM7Jkk&feature=related   Michelle Obama speaks on spreading wealth
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama -Ferrakhan - The Ties That Bind


Obama-Farrakhan Ties Are Close, Ex-Farrakhan Aide Says




A former top deputy to Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan tells Newsmax that Barack Obama’s ties to the black nationalist movement in Chicago run deep, and that for many years the two men have had “an open line between them” to discuss policy and strategy, either directly or through intermediaries.

 

“Remember that for years, if you were a politician in Chicago, you had to have some type of relationship with Louis Farrakhan. You had to. If you didn’t, you would be ostracized out of black Chicago,” said Dr. Vibert White Jr., who spent most of his adult life as a member and ultimately top officer of the Nation of Islam.

 

White broke with the group in 1995 and is now a professor of African-American history at the University of Central Florida in Orlando.

 

White said Obama was “part of the Chicago scene” where Farrakhan, Jesse Jackson, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr. and radicals would go to each other’s events and support each other’s causes.

 

“Even though Chicago is the third-largest city in the country, within the black community, the political and militant nationalist community is very small. So it wouldn’t be uncommon for [Obama and Farrakhan] to show up at events together, or at least be there and communicate with each other,” White told Newsmax.

 

The Anti-Defamation League has denounced Farrakhan and his Nation of Islam as a “hate group.”

 

Farrakhan has called Jews “bloodsuckers,” “satanic” and accused them of running the slave trade. He has labeled gays as “degenerates.” In a 2006 speech, the ADL again condemned Farrakhan when he said: “These false Jews promote the filth of Hollywood that is seeding the American people and the people of the world and bringing you down in moral strength. … It's the wicked Jews the false Jews that are promoting lesbianism, homosexuality. It's wicked Jews, false Jews that make it a crime for you to preach the word of God, then they call you homophobic!"

 

 

Obama was careful to “denounce” Farrakhan’s comments – but not the man -- during the Democratic primary season earlier this year, but only after Hillary Clinton called him out for benefiting from Farrakhan’s support.

 

Farrakhan endorsed Obama in a videotaped speech to his followers at Mosque Miryam in Chicago in February. “You are the instruments that God is gonna use to bring about universal change, and that is why Barack has captured the youth,” Farrakhan said.

 

He told the crowd that Obama was the new “messiah.” See Video: Farrakhan Endorses Obama, Calls Him Messiah.

Once the news media and the Clinton campaign got hold of those comments from Farrakhan, demands mounted from all sides that Obama “renounce” Farrakhan.

 

But as he has done repeatedly throughout this campaign, Obama was careful to parse his words.

 

“You know, I have been very clear in my denunciation of Minister Farrakhan's anti-Semitic comments,” he said during one appearance on “Meet the Press.” “I think that they are unacceptable and reprehensible.”

 

Obama hastened to point out that Farrakhan had been praising him as “an African-American who seems to be bringing the country together. I obviously can't censor him, but it is not support that I sought. And we’re not doing anything, I assure you, formally or informally with Minister Farrakhan.”

 

But Obama, once again, was less than candid.

 

In 1995, according to a profile of Obama that appeared in the Chicago Reader newspaper, Obama “took time off from attending campaign coffees to attend October’s Million Man March in Washington, D.C.”

 

At the time, Obama was running for the Illinois Senate from Chicago’s South Side, a seat he won after getting surrogates to challenge the signatures on nominating petitions for his chief rival, the incumbent Alice Palmer.

 

The march, which fell far short of attracting the million men it advertised, was organized by Farrakhan and by Obama’s then-pastor, the anti-white black nationalist Wright.

 

Obama spoke at length with the Chicago Reader upon his return from the Million Man March. “What I saw was a powerful demonstration of an impulse and need for African-American men to come together to recognize each other and affirm our rightful place in the society," he said.

 

“These are mean, cruel times, exemplified by a ‘lock ’em up, take no prisoners’ mentality that dominates the Republican-led Congress,” Obama said.

 

“Historically, African-Americans have turned inward and towards black nationalism whenever they have a sense, as we do now, that the mainstream has rebuffed us, and that white Americans couldn't care less about the profound problems African-Americans are facing."

 

“Black nationalism” is a current of thought and political action in the African-American community that has been championed by the likes of Farrakhan, Wright, Malcolm X, the Black Panthers and Khalid al-Mansour. Obama discussed his attraction to black nationalism at length in his 1995 memoir “Dreams of My Father.”

 

Obama further parsed his words in a Feb. 25, 2008, presentation to a Jewish community meeting in Cleveland, Ohio, where he insisted that Wright “does not have a close relationship with Louis Farrakhan.”

 

And yet, just months earlier, Wright’s Trumpet magazine gave Farrakhan its Lifetime Achievement Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. Trumpeter Award, saying that Farrakhan “truly epitomized greatness.”

 

That award was the fruit of a long and deep relationship between the two men, White told Newsmax. In 1984, Wright accompanied Farrakhan on his much-criticized trip to meet Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi, at a time when Gadhafi was considered an enemy of the United States.

 

Wright also accompanied Farrakhan and Jackson to Syria in 1986, where they successfully negotiated with Syrian strongman for the release of downed American pilot Robert O. Goodman.

 

Obama’s Speaking Style

 

In addition to the ideological affinity Obama expressed for the black nationalist movement, White believes that Obama owes much of his success as a public orator to speaking techniques that Farrakhan developed over the years, and exploited for years to great success.

 

“If you listen to the rhetoric and you take away Obama’s political jargon, you hear a religious tenor to it that is very much Nation of Islam-like. I don’t know if anyone has ever touched on it, but Obama’s speaking style is very Malcolm-like, very Farrakhan-like,” White said.

 

Any American who has listened to early radio or television interviews of Obama can hear how dramatically Obama’s speaking style has changed since he became a United States senator.

 

In clips dating from 2001 and even early 2004, Obama speaks haltingly and in long, rambling sentences packed with legalese and dense pseudo-academic rhetoric. But not today.

 

“As a former minister of the Nation of Islam, I know how they speak,” White told Newsmax. “I don’t know who was training Obama. But that style is not a ministerial style like in the Christian church. It’s a Nation of Islam style.”

 

White began in the late 1970s as a foot soldier in the Fruit of Islam, the military branch of Farrakhan’s Black Muslim group, then rose to become a minister of the Nation of Islam and a top deputy to Farrakhan himself.

 

Known initially as Brother Vibert L.X., and later as Minister V.L. Muhammad, he parted ways with Farrakhan not long after the Million Man March, after nearly 25 years within the organization.

 

White’s 2002 book “Inside the Nation of Islam” prompted death threats by Farrakhan loyalists, so he left Illinois and moved to Florida to teach at the University of Central Florida.

 

He told Newsmax that Obama’s remarkable speaking style, even his manner of standing at a podium to appear larger than life, is directly copied from Farrakhan.

 

“If the Nation of Islam can’t do anything else, it can train people how to speak. And nobody can outspeak a Muslim minister,” he said.

 

Earlier this year, a pro-Clinton blog run by former CIA officer Larry Johnson unearthed a 2004 photograph showing Michelle Obama and Farrakahn’s wife, Mother Khadijah Farrakhan, at an event hosted by Jackson’s Citizenship Education Foundation.

 

 

Newsmax queried Obama’s U.S. Senate office, his Chicago office and his campaign press office about his ties to Farrakhan, but did not receive a reply.

 

Ever since he appeared before the annual policy conference of the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee in June, Obama has attempted to convince the Jewish community that he is pro-Israel.

 

But his longstanding ties to Farrakhan, Wright and Palestinian activist Rashid Khalidi, among others, have disturbed many Jewish community leaders.

 

Sen. John McCain publicly chastised The Los Angeles Times on Thursday for not releasing a videotape the newspaper said it possessed of a 2003 dinner for Khalidi, where Obama reportedly accused Israel of carrying out a “genocide” against the Palestinians.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Judging a Man by the Company He Keeps: Obama's Endorsements Should Give Us Cause to Worry

Gov. Sarah asked what it was about Sen. Obama that these radical are attracted to?
 
Lets look ar some of the Obama supporters now.
 

Hamas first endorsed the candidObama in April when Hamas political adviser Ahmed Yousef said the Mideast terrorist group supports Obama's foreign policy positions.

"We don't mind -- actually we like Mr. Obama. We hope he will [win] the election and I do believe he is like John Kennedy, great man with great principle, and he has a vision to change America to make it in a position to lead the world community but not with domination and arrogance," Yousef told conservative radio host John Batchelor and WorldNetDaily reporter Aaron Klein.

Hamas yanked its support in June when Obama made a pro-Israel speech to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, Reuters reported. But last week Yousef told Batchelor and Klein that Hamas would send Obama a congratulatory letter "the moment that he will win the election."

Obama has also gotten a nod of approval from Iran.

The country's parliament speaker said on Oct. 22 that Iran would prefer an Obama presidency. "We are leaning more in favor of Barack Obama because he is more flexible and rational, even though we know American policy will not change that much," Ali Larijani told Agence France-Presse.

Chosun Shinbo, a newspaper based in Japan that is a mouthpiece for the North Korean government, wrote in an editorial in June: "We will see a better relationship between the U.S. and the Korean Peninsula with Obama, who sternly criticizes Bush and who would meet the leader of Chosun without pre-conditions."

In February, Investors Business Daily reported that while not endorsing Obama, Colombian guerilla terrorist organization FARC's chieftain Raul Reyes has said he wants to see him in the White House. He told supporters that he met "two gringos" who said "the new president of their country will be Obama and that they are interested in your compatriots. Obama will not support "Plan Colombia" nor will he sign the TLC (Free Trade Agreement)." Plan Colombia is the U.S. program funding the war on drugs and giving military support to the Colombian government.

Obama has even garnered the praises of Louis Farrakhan, leader of the Nation of Islam. "You are the instruments that God is going to use to bring about universal change, and that is why Barack has captured the youth. And he has involved young people in a political process that they didn't care anything about. That's a sign. When the Messiah speaks, the youth will hear, and the Messiah is absolutely speaking," Farrakhan said.

Fidel Castro has also jumped on the Obama bandwagon, saying Obama "without doubt is, from the social and human point, the most advanced candidate" running for the U.S. presidency, Reuters reported in May.

 

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama: Just another Mule in a Horses Harness

Having spend hours and hours studying the candidates through out the primaries- pouring through journals, scouring the Internet for government legislative records, reviewing the candidates voting records and comparing their stump speeches throughout the election with an eye towards flip flopping on issues I suspect I spend more time than the average voters on trying to determine who was being forth right. I have even discovered that the so called fact checkers get it wrong so I have made it a point to go to the actual pieces of legislative to confirm the veracity of the the various candidates claims.
 
Having said that I really respect that McCain continues to challenge us to look into his record. I can understand why he hopes voters will do as he asks because those who do will see that he does in fact have a clear record of breaking with his own party on key pieces of legislation and bucking the status quo when it comes to government overspending. This is a man who in fact has NEVER once asked for a single piece of pork barrel spending in his entire career as a Congressman or as a Senator. 

Regarding Obama I can tell he has a legal background -he is smooth communicator but his words seem very measured and calculated. I was somewhat surprised to see that he was presenting as part of his plan to deal with the economy something's that I had heard McCain and Palin say over the past few weeks. Mind you, he used his own words to make the a point but the point was originally made by McCain and Palin.

How many times have we heard McCain say that he wants to keep, the $700,000,000.00 dollars that we are sending abroad to countries that do not like us very much, here in America by becoming energy independent? Tonight Obama added that to his proposal. He did casually as if it had always been a part of his plan. He almost quoted Mccain verbatim. Lets not forget that Obama has only recently come around to the idea of drilling at all. In the last debate he could barely force himself to say that he would drill for oil. Tonight he was talking about drilling and drilling right away. Again those sentiments ranked VERY HIGHLY with the focus groups and Palin and McCain both have gotten points for drilling that message home so could it be said that Obama is cherry picking whatever seems popular with the voters?

For example, last weeks Palin received exceptionally high marks from the focus groups when she addressed the impact of the economy on the middle class. Tonight, I heard Obama say something very similar to what Palin had said in the VP debate. Prior to the VP debates he never said anything remotely like it his stump speeches. Did he lick his finger and hold it up to the wind or did he see that what Palin said resonated with middle America? Was Obama once again cherry picking?
 
In both Presidential debates I noted something interesting. Two times in particular when McCain was up first and gave particularly in depth foreign policy responses. Obama responded saying" I actually agree with Sen McCain " and then he rephrased it a bit and fluffed it out with more wordy words but added nothing of genuine depth. He also did this several times when debating Hillary Clinton during the primaries. I have come to believe that it is an attempt by Obama to appear more knowledgeable on the subject by riding piggy back on the more sophisticated and thought out response that McCain and Hillary Clinton could bring to the issue. In the first McCain-Obama debate I watched Obamas face, as McCain delivered a complex, detailed response and I found myself wondering if Obama actually even fully understood what McCain was saying.
 
Having studied Obamas voting records, speeches and so forth it seems he is forever altering his policy by cherry picking whatever policies seem popular with the voters. What then does this man actually believe? Will he always rule by defaulting to whatever is politically expedient or will he be able to make tough choice in our best interest?
This makes me nervous. Yes, Obama is a very skilled speaker, he is young and charismatic but does he have the judgement, experience, authenticity that we want in a President?  I have to ask because other issues not brought up in this debate require that I must..Is Obama being fully honest with us?  The dark spectors of Terrorist William Ayres, the racist hate monger Jeremiah Wright who Obama claimed for 20 years was his close Spiritual advisor, the Hammas endorsement of Obama's canidacy, the illegal campaign contribution from a Palestinian group that had to be returned. Certainly lets not forget the Freddy and Fannie funds that were sent his way or his connection to Acorn... the list of associates and questionable dealings goes on and on and i have only begun to scratch the surface.  

I keep remembering the wisdom of my grandmother regarding symbolism over substance. "You can put a shinny horses saddle and fancy horse harness on a mule but despite the fancy dress it is still just a mule in a horses harness." McCain on the other hand may not be a show horse, but he is work horse and his records show that he is defintly not a big bloated government mule.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Are You a McCain or Obama supporter? Do You Really Know?

I have a friend who lives next door. She and I have discussed issues of politics over the last few years. She and I are both single women, no children and self employed. We have struggled with the economy and keeping our bills payed while trying ot expand and grow our business. I know her political views pretty well. I know where she stands on most things.
 
My friend wants a reduction on inheritance tax, wants reduction on small business and self employment tax, wants for us to drill for oil now, wants to crack down on illegal immigration and their getting benefits. These are her major issues. The things she cares about.
 
So your probably thinking she is a McCain /Palin voter Right?
 
Well you would be wrong. the sad thing is my friend does not like politics and hates trying to keep up with what the politicians are doing. Her Cousin is a new Democrat Congressman and she is very proud of him although she has no idea how her cousin votes. When I ask her she shrugs and says "Oh I don't like to read what people say about him." So I asked her "Do you ask him where he stands?" She says she does not want to talk about it. 
 
Flash forward: Oprah endorses Obama. My friend loves Oprah. She listens to Obama speak and watches the democratic convention and I was speaking with her on the phone and she says" I am watchingthe convention and it is sooooo gooooood" I ask her how do you think Obama plans to pay for the tax cuts and the new programs? you know - the specifics?" My friend gets frustraited by this question and says.." Marie I don't want to talk about it...can't you just feel good about what he says? " I say I need more than words and she sighs and hangs up on me.
 
This makes me sad... and very frustraited. How many times have you known someone who votes a party line because they have always voted that way. They don't like the mess of politics and they do not want to make an effort to educate themselves so they go with whoever the partisan candidate is or if they call themselves an independent they go with change for the sake of change not even questioning if the change is for better or for worse. Like my friend they just want their ears tickled with pretty words without substance.
 
In this campaign we really do have two candidates for change - but the type of change is really markedly different despite some similar sounding rhetoric at times.  McCain/Palin do not wish to alter the core fabric that makes up our Gov. They want to reform and scale down and restore it to its original purpose. Iron out the bureaucratic wrinkles so to speak. They wish to seek out, destroy and eliminate corruption and wasteful Gov. spending so that our tax dollars go further and do more then get flushed away through inefficient excess. They want to stimulate economic growth and recovery by scaling back taxes on small business and on individuals so that we keep more of what we make. They understand that small business are the lifes blood of our economy - More Americans work for small biz than for corporations. Small business hire new employees when they can and fire when they have to. Right now is not the time to raise taxes on Small business who are already facing higher transportation costs, higher general operating costs  and higher material or product costs. In fact in many cases they are already being forced to reduce their staff and production. McCain and Palin do not want to cripple small business under more taxes and mandates that they cannot afford. McCain and Palin understand the need for getting energy under our control and they are willing to drill responsibly to get the oil and the natural gas we need now while also investing in alternative energy sources for the future.
 
Obama doesn't get it...and sadly neither do his supporters. --- Just like my friend who does not want tomake the effort to understand politics and do the fact checking.  She wants her ears tickled with pretty words and promises and in the end if Obama wins she may need to hold on to those words -because when he is finished taxing her small business and raising the cost of fuel she won't have anything else to cling to.
 
Below is a short quiz - It asks your opinions and after you finish responding it will tell you where Obama stands on the issues to see if he is really the guy you do or do not want to be voting for based on your opinion. Take it and see how you do and send this link to all your friends and family.  If you are an Obama supporter it will confirm that you are voting for the right guy, if you are a Conservative it will probably confirm your vote, If you are an independent or undecided it might give you something to think about.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »